Why dying fish should not be an environmental surprise

The sad pictures of over a million native fish carcasses, floating along the Darling River in NSW, brought water quality right into focus. Local residents found dead Murray Cod over 50 years old, a grim indication of the significance of the disaster.

The striking feature, that kept repeating in interviews of concerned locals, was the genuine shock, the pained surprise that this happened.

An interim report by the NSW Department of Primary Industries found that the mass fish death was likely caused by a lack of dissolved oxygen in the water, caused by several related and compounding factors. These included high air temperatures up to the event, low flow conditions, and changes in water temperature associated with a drop in air temperature.

But fatalism and droughts aside, water flows can be largely managed. So why did this happen, and what can we do to prevent it from happening again?

We explore how continuous water monitoring is possible so that a fish kill event is never a surprise.

Existing technology: Continuous water monitoring solutions

Water conditions and temperature can be monitored continuously. The conditions that increase the risk of algal blooms can be detected, such as elevated nutrient levels in waters, thermal stratification, and forecast changes in temperatures. Monitoring this risk can allow for active management, such as environmental buyback of stored water.

Commercial fish farms already use remote water monitoring systems to detect threatening environmental conditions to fish and prevent them before they become a real problem. Screenshot below of our work with Pentair, for illustration.

These remote sensor networks can continuously monitor water properties to understand the risks to ecosystems from pH, salinity, turbidity, and temperature, to dissolved oxygen and more. These commercial fish farms even undertake biological monitoring of the presence and abundance of pest invertebrate species.

Easy alerting and notification systems are automated and can trigger immediate remedial action (like using aerators to bring clean pest-free water up from depths) should a parameter fall outside tolerances. In fact, they take constant action, continuously refining water conditions, as measures trend in this direction or that.

  • Author: Stephane Malhomme
  • Read time: 3 mins
  • Region/Location: Australia, Queensland
  • Vertical: Coal Seam Gas
  • Sectors: Oil & Gas
  • Hardware: Campbell Scientific
image1-1

Continuous water monitoring using eagle.io’s environment data management platform.

There are some substantial differences between open-sea aquaculture cages and natural river flow ecosystems. But these are more a matter of ecosystems and biology, rather than technology. There are also differences in economic modeling and valuation. Commercial aquaculture can put a dollar amount on each fish that dies, or yields lost, making IoT monitoring a clearer economic proposition.

While the value of fish lost in the recent event is likely to be greater than that of a commercial crop (due to secondary ecosystem impacts), the economic impacts of the event are shared with the whole community.

These fish lack the single economic guardian that the farmed fish in sea cages have.

Detection of thermal stratification in water supply storages

The team at Xylem and the University of Queensland (UQ) have been working on technology to use a drone to detect stratification in drinking water supply dams, by monitoring temperature profiles and transmitting data back to eagle.io.

When conditions are detected indicating a risk of thermal inversion, aeration can be triggered to mix profiles in an attempt to avoid the event occurring.

UQ and Xylem are collaborating on a custom-built drone to automate Water Quality Profiling using the YSI EXO platform Sonde. The concept of reality is driven by the need to quickly measure an intrusion event or static water body that may be under stress from surrounding environmental conditions.

image2-1

Effect of management action (aeration) on thermal stratification in large water bodies. Image courtesy of the University of Queensland.

A good example is the measurement of temperature in the water profile allowing the team to detect conditions that may lead to temperature inversions occurring (where cold deep oxygen-poor water flips with warmer oxygen-rich surface water, often resulting in fish kills).

When high-risk conditions are detected operators of the water supplies can trigger corrective actions aeration as well as preemptively managing the treatment of the release water for environmental conditions and/or human consumption.

The technology is available to monitor in real time the risk of these events occurring. The ROI of this continuous water monitoring technology has been demonstrated in commercial applications. One of our state clients, Queensland’s DNRM, has already started trialing effectively cloud-based water management systems, between creek heights and farmers’ needs.

Conclusion

The political will and the technology enablers are all there. What is needed more than ever is a clearer economic valuation model of natural ecosystems, one taking into account holistic economic value derived from natural assets, as well as the impact on ecosystems and local communities.

The more transparency and detail we can provide, the easier it will be to develop high-performing, modern environmental protection and management programs — and Eagle.io is designed to enable them.

If you’re looking to elevate your monitoring, eagle.io’s environmental data management platform can help unlock more meaningful insights. It’s able to free up the equivalent of one full-time employee and is trusted by the world's best environmental scientists, engineers, and consultants.

Contact us to learn about our EIoT platform for remote water monitoring.

EAG_2023-Report_Mock-up 2

2023 Insights into Environmental Monitoring

Download now